Imagine: what if defendants were barred from ever receiving 'justice' greater than the terms they argued should apply to those who sued them. Would that not be justice? Equitable treatment? What if a violation of Magistrate James L. Cott's rights could not exceed the favorable terms he pushed on plaintiffs in his court? Would that not be equitable? We need to stop making excuses for gender and race based discrimination in our courts and law schools. It's time that 'No one gets a pass' means 'No one gets a pass' - regardless of race, judgeship, or any other discriminatory factor.
Imagine: what if defendants were barred from ever receiving 'justice' greater than the terms they argued should apply to those who sued them. Would that not be justice? Equitable treatment? What if a violation of Magistrate James L. Cott's rights could not exceed the favorable terms he pushed on plaintiffs in his court? Would that not be equitable?
We need to stop making excuses for gender and race based discrimination in our courts and law schools. It's time that 'No one gets a pass' means 'No one gets a pass' - regardless of race, judgeship, or any other discriminatory factor.
28.07.2020